When it pays to stay
single
Though being married
offers a number of financial advantages, being single also has some
clear-cut benefits. Learn how it affects taxes, credit, debt and other
key issues.
By Bankrate.com
Every married person who has argued with a spouse about money has longed
to be single again and in total financial control.
That wish usually subsides -- how quickly depends in part on the dollar
amount in dispute. But that fleeting thought raises an interesting
question.
Is there a time when being single is more financially desirable?
Sure, marriage has many economic advantages, such as pooled income,
shared health-insurance coverage, although more companies now also offer
this benefit to unmarried couples, and Social Security survivor
benefits. Even the marriage tax penalty has been eased in recent years.
But in some instances, it's more practical to remain unhitched.
"One thing to keep in mind is that it's always a mix of financial and
emotional decisions," says Scott Farber, a wealth management adviser
based in Natick, Mass. "It's difficult to look at a relationship from a
strictly financial standpoint."
"However, there are some general instances when it might be better not
to be married."
That's how Sheryl Garrett, a certified financial planner with Garrett
Planning Network in Shawnee Mission, Kan., sees it, too.
"There are definitely way more advantages on (the married) side of the
fence," says Garrett. "But there are some clear ones on the unmarried
side, too."
While there's no "typical couple" that should consider living together
without official legal status, there are some typical issues. Basically,
says Garrett, staying legally unattached could be financially beneficial
for one or both partners when these five issues come into play:
1. Liability
2. Credit and debt concerns
3. Survivor's benefits
4. Taxes
5. Children
Liability for married and unmarried
One of the great things about marriage is you get to share everything.
That's also one of the worst things about marriage, especially when it
comes to liability issues. You could be financially responsible for
judgments against your spouse, such as personal lawsuits or Internal
Revenue Service liens and all types of legal actions in between.
Janice K. Hobbs, owner of Jan Hobbs Financial Group in Orange, Calif.,
says this is a concern of many of her clients who primarily are
high-income individuals.
"We have a lot of doctors as clients, both partners are physicians,
which is a high-liability profession," says Hobbs. If one of the doctors
is sued, the other person's assets are just as liable -- if they are
married. By staying single, Hobbs says, only the one physician's income
and assets would be at risk.
The liability issue doesn't just worry still-working people who are
making a good living.
Garrett says a book buyer raised similar concerns at a signing for her
book, "Money without Matrimony," that she co-wrote with Debra Neiman.
The woman, in her late 50s, had a new man in her life and they were
considering another go at marriage. She was in a good financial
position, but a combination of previous marital and business problems
had left him dealing with the aftermath of a divorce, bankruptcy and
some lingering financial issues.
"He hadn't had much of a chance to recover financially, although he had
moved on emotionally, and he had a terrible credit score. He was a great
guy with completely understandable credit problems," says Garrett.
"Her question was, 'If we did get married, would that be a bad idea?' My
answer was that if they keep things separately, depending on the state
(of residence), his debts in his name and her assets in her name, you're
fine. But if he gets sued. ...
"She said, 'Stop. I think we're going to wait.'"
Commingled credit and debt
That cautious woman's remarriage query also raised the issue of shared
credit, which Garrett says can go hand in hand with liability worries.
The credit-reporting business has evolved so now each person has an
individual credit score. So unless you borrow money together, getting
married doesn't automatically hurt you from a credit standpoint, says
Garrett.
Debt is a slightly different matter. That's because in some states, when
you marry you also marry your spouse's debt, especially if post-marriage
payments come out of a joint account.
"If you have a situation where one partner is heavily in debt,
especially if the one in debt has fewer assets, marriage could
potentially expose the nondebtor's assets," says Farber.
Where you live also could affect your debt status. In community-property
jurisdictions -- Alaska, Arizona, California, Idaho, Louisiana, Nevada,
New Mexico, Texas, Washington, Wisconsin or Puerto Rico -- community
property includes the earnings of both partners while married, as well
as everything purchased with that money. If separate property is
commingled with community property during a marriage, it could be viewed
as community property. Similarly, all debts incurred during marriage,
unless specifically noted as separate, become community-property debts.
It's easier to avoid responsibility for a spendthrift partner's debts
when you simply live together. Just be sure you don't inadvertently
invalidate this unmarried advantage. Don't take on joint transactions,
such as helping your financially struggling partner pay an overdue loan,
or it could show up on your record, too. Back to top
Securing survivor's benefits
When it comes to federal retirement benefits, marriage is advantageous
for many couples. A surviving spouse gets to choose between his or her
own benefits or those of the deceased spouse, whichever is greater.
(This usually happens more often with women, says Garrett, though some
men receive such benefits.)
There's no comparable survivorship payment for partners who just live
together. But this benefit could interfere with the decision of a widow
or widower who wants to remarry.
"Say there's a woman who's a widow and involved with another man," says
Garrett. "She has her deceased husband's benefits and the man has his
own. Together they have enough to live on comfortably.
"But if they get married, her Social Security goes away and she would
qualify for half of her new husband's benefits. That could be several
hundred dollars less a month, and that amount could make a big
difference."
Hobbs agrees. "If your new spouse doesn't have the same work history as
your old spouse, you may have traded off a good benefit," she says.
Contact your local Social Security Administration office and have them
run some numbers for your personal situation. The calculations could
help you decide whether you want to walk down the aisle.
Garrett also warns couples not to forget about how tying the knot could
affect private-sector benefits.
"Fewer people get traditional pensions nowadays, but folks who are now
retired historically had a pension. There are a lot of widows out there
who have their husbands' pensions. If they remarry, they would lose that
pension income. Most seniors know this, but what they don't think about
is health coverage, a big issue now. If you're getting health benefits
from a deceased spouse's coverage, you could lose that, too.
"I really hate that people would choose not to get married if they
really want to because of financial issues," says Garrett, "but at least
know what you're getting into."
Older couples, who are depending primarily on federal medical coverage,
also need to assess their marital or nonmarital situation carefully.
"One of the reasons to get married is to share benefits if you're
older," says Farber. "But the flip side is that you'll then be subject
to the Medicare claims thereafter."
For example, say you have a house in your name only. If you're married
and your spouse goes into a nursing home, Medicare will want to tap your
home, assuming there are no other assets to pay for nursing-home costs,
to recoup its expenses, says Farber. "If you're not married, you remove
the house from that exposure.
"When you have one spouse that's going to be on Medicare and the
non-Medicare spouse is the homeowner, it makes sense to not be married
at that point," she says. "I've heard of situations where people even
get divorced to prevent exposure of assets they acquired together as a
married couple from being subject to claims in this situation." Back to
top
Taxes and the unmarried couple
By now, almost every taxpayer knows about the marriage tax penalty. This
tax-rate quirk generally affects a couple when both earn roughly the
same amount.
"The marriage penalty has been minimized greatly from what it used to
be," says Garrett, "but it still exists, especially for people who both
make a lot of money."
And unless Congress takes action to extend the marriage tax relief, the
penalty will return in full force in 2011. Meanwhile, even with the
temporary tax relief for married couples, there are other tax situations
where being single is more fiscally rewarding.
The tax code is fraught with phase-outs and restrictions. "For example,
the Roth IRA contribution limit for married couples is higher but not
double that of two singles," says Farber. "If you're single and make
between $95,000 and $110,000, you can contribute to an account. If
you're married, you can contribute if you make between $150,000 and
$160,000.
"If each individual earns $90,000, each can contribute up to the limit
unless they are married. By being married, their joint income will be
taken into account and neither can contribute to a Roth because it
exceeds the limit."
Married couples also could face higher tax costs than living-together
counterparts if they own rental real estate.
"Write-offs from rental real estate can be used to offset ordinary
income unless your adjusted gross income exceeds $150,000," says Hobbs.
"And that limit is the same, whether you're married or single.
"Say you had an unmarried couple and each partner kept an old condo and
rented it out. They each would have a $3,000 to $4,000 write-off each
year. But a married couple with $200,000 adjusted gross income cannot
take any of those losses against ordinary income."
A $100,000-per-year income level is not that unusual for investors
looking to get into today's escalating real-estate market, says Hobbs.
That means married rental-unit owners in her Southern California
location often lose out on expected tax benefits. Back to top
Taking care of the kids
Then there are the kids. Both minor children living at home and adult
offspring who are long gone can muddle the
married-versus-living-together equation.
When it comes to obtaining federal financial aid for college, being
unmarried offers an advantage, albeit one that many parents might not be
comfortable taking.
"If there's a child where one adult is the legal parent and the other
isn't, by law you don't have to report the income of the nonparent, but
there are ethical considerations," says Garrett. "The FAFSA form
literally asks for the information on the father and mother. If there's
no legal mother or father, you're answering it correctly. But if the
partner is helping or will help pay for the schooling, that's something
you probably should consider in answering."
A more emotional issue for many unmarried couples is grown kids from
previous relationships.
"One of the biggest reasons that some older people choose not to remarry
is because of the family dynamics, whiplash or backlash from adult
children," says Garrett. "This new person in a parent's life might be
really charming and attentive, but might just be after Mom or Dad's
money, 'our inheritance.'"
In such cases, Garrett has some unequivocal advice for the kids: "Get
your noses out of your parents' business and let them get on with their
lives."
Farber agrees that emotional issues "are almost always going to take the
front seat." But, he says, "financial issues you can deal with; you can
come up with solutions." One of the easiest solutions: basic estate
planning.
"You have to have a will or trust in place to direct where your assets
will go, regardless of whether you're married or just living together,"
says Garrett. "If you're married, you can say where you don't want them
to go. If you're not married, you can determine where they will go."
This explicit distribution direction is necessary because without it,
the state decides. If you stay unmarried and have no will or trust, all
your assets will go by default to your next of kin, your children. Your
partner will get nothing. Conversely, if you marry and don't have a will
or trust, your new spouse will get it all, leaving your kids without an
inheritance. (For articles on wills and estate planning, see "Estate
planning for everyone.")
"Put in place a living trust that spells out that my partner will get
this and my kids will get this," says Garrett. "Put all that in print so
that it's not left open."
By Kay Bell,
Bankrate.com |
|
Public Interest
Reports
Hosteze.com was launched to make web hosting easy
for the beginner and advanced alike. We offer reliable personal,
business, corporate and non-profit web hosting solutions.
Our packages offer
the best value with straightforward, solid, affordable,
feature-packed hosting. Whether you’re a novice user just starting
out or operate a heavily trafficked site, Hosteze has a the hosting
plan that will help you make the most of your web experience! We make it easy enough so that the beginner
user as well as advanced user can take advantage of all the Internet
has to offer. Hosteze is committed to providing quality, reliable
and easy to use web hosting solutions.
As our name implies, we strive to make the
hosting experience as easy and straightforward as possible. The
simplicity of our service allows beginners to get online with ease
while our technical superiority provides excellent service for the
more advanced. Whatever your level of expertise, Hosteze will be
there to assist you as needed.
Our top priority is to provide high-quality
reliable services and top-notch customer service to all customers.
Learn More
|
